Keyword summary
ā 55% 1 analyzed article/video 902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forensic Evidence results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 2,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 61% (22,558 of 56,731 keywords). This Forensic Evidence is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Forensic Evidence
Keyword details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst