Keyword summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Justice results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 4,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,245 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (34,473 of 58,034 keywords). This Food Justice is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Food Justice
Keyword details
Total words: 7,245
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst