Author summary
80%1 analyzed article/video837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keket Sanders results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 660 hits. Analysis detected 3,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,798 of 9,435 authors). This Keket Sanders is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Keket Sanders
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
81%Keket Sanders (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.7%19.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos