Keyword summary
96%4 analyzed articles/videos2,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Access results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,685 hits. Analysis detected 12,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,624 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (26,535 of 53,106 keywords). This Food Access is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Food Access
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
50%Food Access (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate