Author summary
87% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alejandra Cid results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 2,971 hits . Analysis detected 18,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,731 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,618 of 9,481 authors). This Alejandra Cid is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Alejandra Cid
Author details
Total words: 16,731
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.8% 17.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.1% 14.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst