Author summary
87%4 analyzed articles/videos4,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alejandra Cid results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 2,971 hits. Analysis detected 18,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,731 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,618 of 9,481 authors). This Alejandra Cid is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Alejandra Cid
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
62%Alejandra Cid (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,731
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.8%17.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 14.1%14.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate