Keyword summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatty Liver Disease results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 448 hits . Analysis detected 4,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (42,111 of 59,756 keywords). This Fatty Liver Disease is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Fatty Liver Disease
Keyword details
Total words: 6,460
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst