Keyword summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethics Committee results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (27,842 of 53,107 keywords). This Ethics Committee is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Ethics Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 2,472
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Straw Man: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst