Keyword summary
91%3 analyzed articles/videos1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Burnett results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 7,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,500 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (18,249 of 59,653 keywords). This Erin Burnett is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Erin Burnett
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
70%Erin Burnett (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,500
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.3%14.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate