Keyword summary
64%5 analyzed articles/videos3,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Schmitt results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,264 hits. Analysis detected 13,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,244 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (45,845 of 59,526 keywords). This Eric Schmitt is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Eric Schmitt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
23%Eric Schmitt (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 19,244
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate