Keyword summary
40% 23 analyzed articles/videos 14,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dogs results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 3,625 hits . Analysis detected 40,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 71,069 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (55,788 of 59,771 keywords). This Dogs is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Dogs
Keyword details
Total words: 71,069
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score22 analyzed articles71.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst