Keyword summary
ā 40% 1 analyzed article/video 898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dialog Cafe results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ā 27% (42,317 of 57,614 keywords). This Dialog Cafe is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Dialog Cafe
Keyword details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst