Keyword summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos1,335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Debbie Wasserman Schultz results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 413 hits. Analysis detected 5,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,340 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (27,015 of 59,653 keywords). This Debbie Wasserman Schultz is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠55%Debbie Wasserman Schultz (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,340
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos