Keyword summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deadpool 4 results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 143 hits . Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (19,465 of 59,653 keywords). This Deadpool 4 is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Deadpool 4
Keyword details
Total words: 1,928
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst