Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Glasser results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (15,936 of 59,653 keywords). This David Glasser is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
David Glasser
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠74%David Glasser (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos