Keyword summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Currency results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 3,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 50% (30,265 of 59,643 keywords). This Currency is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Currency
Keyword details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst