Keyword summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court Dispute results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Self-Serving Bias , and Red Herring , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (48,957 of 59,653 keywords). This Court Dispute is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Court Dispute
Keyword details
Total words: 5,876
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst