Keyword summary
22%1 analyzed article/video1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court Dispute results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Self-Serving Bias, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 664 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (48,957 of 59,653 keywords). This Court Dispute is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Court Dispute
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
18%Court Dispute (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos