Keyword summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Nuclear Program results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 3,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 55% (27,229 of 59,771 keywords). This Civilian Nuclear Program is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Civilian Nuclear Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
55%Civilian Nuclear Program (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos