Keyword summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 2,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (44,975 of 59,797 keywords). This Christine is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Christine
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
25%Christine (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,296
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos