Author summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Shapiro results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 361 hits . Analysis detected 2,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,588 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,984 of 9,538 authors). This Emily Shapiro is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Emily Shapiro
Author details
Total words: 4,588
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst