Keyword summary
88% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Japan Relations results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 2,383 hits . Analysis detected 16,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,273 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (22,298 of 58,034 keywords). This China Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. China Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 12,273
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score16 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst