Keyword summary
77%5 analyzed articles/videos2,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Protective Services results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,344 hits. Analysis detected 10,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,304 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (32,890 of 59,653 keywords). This Child Protective Services is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Child Protective Services
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
45%Child Protective Services (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,304
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate