Keyword summary
69%1 analyzed article/video608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casualty Figures results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (16,766 of 59,730 keywords). This Casualty Figures is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Casualty Figures
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
72%Casualty Figures (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos