Keyword summary
23%3 analyzed articles/videos4,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabinoids results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 1,108 hits. Analysis detected 8,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,164 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (56,722 of 59,653 keywords). This Cannabinoids is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Cannabinoids
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
5%Cannabinoids (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 19,164
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos