Author summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 1,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Ellett results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 469 hits . Analysis detected 3,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,389 of 8,957 authors). This Joe Ellett is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Joe Ellett
Author details
Total words: 4,504
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst