Keyword summary
29%4 analyzed articles/videos7,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cabinet Meeting results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,690 hits. Analysis detected 17,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,288 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (56,409 of 59,771 keywords). This Cabinet Meeting is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Cabinet Meeting
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
6%Cabinet Meeting (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 35,288
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles35.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate