Keyword summary
60% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bribery results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,365 hits . Analysis detected 10,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,310 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (26,816 of 53,833 keywords). This Bribery is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Bribery
Keyword details
Total words: 11,310
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst