Keyword summary
68%7 analyzed articles/videos5,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston Police results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,729 hits. Analysis detected 13,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,799 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (48,692 of 59,716 keywords). This Boston Police is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Boston Police
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
19%Boston Police (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,799
Article count: 7
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate