Keyword summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bezos Earth Fund results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,808 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (26,867 of 54,518 keywords). This Bezos Earth Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Bezos Earth Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 4,808
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst