Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bay Area History results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,534 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (32,724 of 59,653 keywords). This Bay Area History is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Bay Area History
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
46%Bay Area History (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,534
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos