Keyword summary
39% 1 analyzed article/video 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Audrey Jane Jurek results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 839 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (5,856 of 59,386 keywords). This Audrey Jane Jurek is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Audrey Jane Jurek
Keyword details
Total words: 1,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.1% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst