Keyword summary
94% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artifical Intelligence results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 4,091 hits . Analysis detected 27,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,930 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (18,195 of 53,020 keywords). This Artifical Intelligence is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Artifical Intelligence
Keyword details
Total words: 17,930
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst