Keyword summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariel Hukporti results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 741 hits . Analysis detected 3,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 52% (28,817 of 59,653 keywords). This Ariel Hukporti is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Ariel Hukporti
Keyword details
Total words: 5,904
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst