Keyword summary
21%3 analyzed articles/videos1,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arcata City Council results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 3,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,394 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (51,499 of 59,694 keywords). This Arcata City Council is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Arcata City Council
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
14%Arcata City Council (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,394
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate