Five People Who AREN'T Currently on Arcata's City Council Have Pulled Paperwork to Run for Two Seats. Who Are They? 38%

By Dezmond Remington53%

7/30/2026, 9:09:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 730 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of 38% (17,154 of 27,322 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the article peer group.

This November, a battle  an epic one, no doubt  will play out for two Arcata City Council seats. 
The incumbents, Meredith Matthews and Kimberley White, are attempting to retain control of their positions; five others have decided to run. 
Who are they? 
Note: These candidates “pulled” the paperwork necessary to run, Arcata’s city clerk told us yesterday, and are gathering the needed signatures or finalizing the paperwork. 
White is, as of yesterday, the only one who has qualified. 
Genevieve Serna 
An analyst with the county’s elections office, Serna ran for city council during the last cycle in 2024. 
She lost out on claiming a seat by only 300 votes, the best showing by anyone running who wasn’t already on the council. 
She’s also the only loser from that ballot making another attempt. 
(So far.) 
She’s also the chair of the city’s Transportation Safety Committee, which she’s been on since 2022. 
Making getting around Arcata safer was one of her top priorities in 2024; according to her website, she’s an advocate for slower speed limits, enhanced crosswalks, and cyclist-friendly infrastructure. 
She was in favor of raising the sales tax and was looking forward to the construction of the Arcata Cap because of the safety and connectivity improvements and the potential to build some housing. 
“I hold a deep love for Arcata and cherish its breathtaking natural setting and vibrant spirit,” she wrote on her website. 
“I am dedicated to the future of our city and determined to enhance Arcata for both longtime residents and newcomers. 
My vision includes welcoming growth while recognizing Arcata’s idyllic charm, making it a place where everyone can thrive amid its unique blend of nature and community.” 
Abigail Strickland 
Strickland is on the city’s planning commission and is a transportation program analyst for the California Coastal Commission, according to her LinkedIn. 
She’s also on the board of the Environmental Protection Information Center; she’s “passionate about public service, planning, and improving the quality of life for current and future generations,” EPIC’s website says. 
Strickland doesn’t appear to have announced her campaign anywhere. 
She didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 
Blase Bonpane 
There may be a few guys here in Humboldt with the same name, and the Outpost was unable to confirm any information on the one running, but they've been teachers, lecturers, wedding singers, the holder of a cannabis cultivation license, and arrested during the 1999 WTO protests in Seattle. 
(If you're the guy, please email me at dezmond@lostcoastoutpost.com.) 
Dan Shahin 
Shahin’s the only new challenger to the council who has officially announced his run for council, late last year. 
Shahin is a software engineer and Palestinian-American who, at one point, frequently attended council meetings to advocate for a sister city relationship with Gaza, but his platform’s pillars are affordable housing, keeping the environment healthy, engaging the community and developing the economy by encouraging entrepreneurship and simplifying permitting. 
He was on Arcata’s economic development committee for two years and is the vice president of the board of trustees for the Humboldt Unitarian Universalist Fellowship. 
“With his combination of professional expertise, community involvement, and fresh perspective, Dan Shahin is ready to serve Arcata with integrity, transparency, and dedication to the common good. 
He looks forward to working with fellow council members, city staff, and residents to build a stronger, more sustainable future for our community.” 
Reese Halter 
Who’s this guy? 
Well, his website says he’s a “a decorated scientist, prolific writer, author, poet, barnstormer, philosopher (cherisher of knowledge) and passionate lover of The Great Mystery, Mother Earth” and is focused on a big list of issues, most of them environmental, though he also wants to remove “big corporate money” from politics and to regulate AI. 
What else do you need to know? 
Well, if that’s not enough, he’s got endorsements from people he claims is a former producer for NBC and two Tasmanian senators. 
“I love this planet,” he wrote. 
“I have dedicated my life to learning, serving, defending Mother Earth and leading. 
I am a decorated PhD scientist and a compassionate vegan. 
Arcata’s counter-culture community and progressive politics are robust. 
We embrace kindness and simple living.” 
The 2026 election will be held November 3. 
Candidates have until August 7 to finish filing their paperwork. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.5%Dezmond Remington: 0.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.6%Confirmation Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Dezmond Remington: 8.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.0%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Dezmond Remington: 2.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 2.7%Dezmond Remington: 3.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.6%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 1.4%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%Dezmond Remington: 0.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.0%Optimism Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Dezmond Remington: 3.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 4.5%Negativity Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.8%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Dezmond Remington: 1.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Dezmond Remington: 1.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.7%This article: 11.2%Dezmond Remington: 5.8%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.3%Halo Effect11.2%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Dezmond Remington: 0.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.6%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 10.7%Dezmond Remington: 2.9%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%Primacy Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.1%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.3%Dezmond Remington: 8.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.3%Appeal to Authority19.3%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.6%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Dezmond Remington: 3.5%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.3%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.0%Dezmond Remington: 3.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion9.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.8%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.5%Dezmond Remington: 5.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.7%Anecdotal7.5%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.5%Dezmond Remington: 3.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.5%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Middle Ground1.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.5%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.9%Dezmond Remington: 4.4%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.0%Unattributed Quote17.9%This article: 3.7%Dezmond Remington: 0.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.7%This article: 14.5%Dezmond Remington: 5.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 4.2%Biased Writer Voice14.5%This article: 7.5%Dezmond Remington: 2.5%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.4%Indoctrination7.5%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Dezmond Remington: 0.5%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

730 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers16%attributed speech610writer words
Selected voice

Reese Halter

96%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words38% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +22.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Reese Halter: 22.2%22.2%Unattributed Quote-21.5 ptsWriter: 21.5%Reese Halter: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%Reese Halter: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+13.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Reese Halter: 13.3%13.3%Indoctrination-9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Reese Halter: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.