Keyword summary
24% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Strickland results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 3,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (49,672 of 59,653 keywords). This Abigail Strickland is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Abigail Strickland
Keyword details
Total words: 7,892
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst