Keyword summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anticorruption Agencies results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 770 hits . Analysis detected 4,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (23,065 of 56,414 keywords). This Anticorruption Agencies is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Anticorruption Agencies
Keyword details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst