Keyword summary
56%2 analyzed articles/videos797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthropic Pbc results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 2,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (25,172 of 55,264 keywords). This Anthropic Pbc is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Anthropic Pbc
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
55%Anthropic Pbc (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,960
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos