Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alta California results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 1,177 hits . Analysis detected 4,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 79% (11,710 of 53,721 keywords). This Alta California is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Alta California
Keyword details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 26.5% 26.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst