Keyword summary
45%1 analyzed article/video964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Academic Senate results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (36,631 of 59,653 keywords). This Academic Senate is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Academic Senate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
39%Academic Senate (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos