Author summary
91% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoe Williams results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 4,210 hits . Analysis detected 36,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,944 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,644 of 8,955 authors). This Zoe Williams is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Zoe Williams
Author details
Total words: 31,944
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.8% 12.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst