Author summary
51% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ziva Branstetter results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 2,491 hits . Analysis detected 9,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,024 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,611 of 8,767 authors). This Ziva Branstetter is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Ziva Branstetter
Author details
Total words: 17,024
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.6% 14.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst