Author summary
77%1 analyzed article/video152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zara Irshad results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 94% (632 of 9,471 authors). This Zara Irshad is worse (more manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Zara Irshad
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
94%Zara Irshad (selected)8%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 608
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510093.3% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles608 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 24.0%24.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 24.8%24.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.9%5.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 24.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos