Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach A. Brooks results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 534 hits . Analysis detected 4,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,895 of 9,471 authors). This Zach A. Brooks is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Zach A. Brooks
Author details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst