Author summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Willoughby Mariano results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 2,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,428 of 9,437 authors). This Willoughby Mariano is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Willoughby Mariano
Author details
Total words: 3,792
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst