Author summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Knight results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 164 hits . Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,800 of 8,940 authors). This Will Knight is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Will Knight
Author details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst