Author summary
22%2 analyzed articles/videos963 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vivian McCall results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,554 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,910 of 8,629 authors). This Vivian McCall is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Vivian McCall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%Vivian McCall (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,554
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate