Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 3,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent Bevins results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,056 hits . Analysis detected 8,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (7,255 of 9,471 authors). This Vincent Bevins is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Vincent Bevins
Author details
Total words: 12,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst