Author summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 1,250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vani Sanganeria results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (5,110 of 9,486 authors). This Vani Sanganeria is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Vani Sanganeria
Author details
Total words: 5,000
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst