Author summary
90% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vala Afshar results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,577 hits . Analysis detected 11,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,672 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,001 of 9,471 authors). This Vala Afshar is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Vala Afshar
Author details
Total words: 12,672
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst