Author summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Undark Magazine results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 569 hits . Analysis detected 3,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,348 of 9,471 authors). This Undark Magazine is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Undark Magazine
Author details
Total words: 5,360
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst